Subscribe to DrG's Free Newsletter |
|
We DO NOT share our email list with anyone. DrG is very respectful of your right to privacy.
For a one-year hard copy subscription, sent through the U.S. mail, send $18 to Healthy Choices for Mind and Body, P.O. Box 19938, Sacramento, CA 95819. All email subscriptions and downloads from the website are free.
DrG's Healthy Choices for Mind and Body is a registered non-profit charitable organization established to promote a world in which all people practice healthy lifestyles. Your contributions are tax deductable.
DrG's Medisense Feature Article
19113-Dietary_Guidelines
A
U.S. Dietary Guidelines Revision
by Ann Gerhardt, MD
November
2019
Print Version
Meetings of the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee have been in
process all year and will continue through March 2020. It
might
be interesting to watch the webcast or even contribute to by submitting
questions. (See links below).
The official federal
Dietary
Guidelines publication is
required under the 1990 National
Nutrition Monitoring and Related Research Act. Every five
years
the U.S. Departments of Health and Human Services and of Agriculture
(hereafter I’ll call ‘the agencies’) must
jointly
analyze the latest dietary and nutrition information and publish a
report to help Americans make smart choices about food.
The statute (Public Law 101-445, 7 U.S.C. 5341 et seq.) requires a
Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, composed of nutrition experts,
to make dietary recommendations based on a preponderance of scientific
evidence. Their recommendations are revised, based on the
agencies’ and the public’s comments, then published
and
stand for 5 years. This process led to the Food Guide
Pyramid,
and all its subsequent modifications, based on science.
The 2015-2020 Guidelines are fairly basic and logical:
1. Follow a healthy eating pattern across the lifespan to
achieve
and maintain a healthy body weight, support nutrient adequacy and
reduce chronic disease.
2. Focus on variety, nutrient density and amount of foods
from
across and within all food groups.
3. Consume an eating pattern low in added sugars, saturated
fats
and sodium.
4. Shift to healthier, more nutrient dense foods in place of
less
healthy.
5. Create and support healthy eating patterns at home,
school,
work and communities.
The
Washington
Post recently
published an article criticizing the process for the 2020-2025
publication. They say that too many committee members have
industry affiliation, though all of them are
university-based.
This might be hard to avoid, since a lot of nutrition research is
funded by food or nutrition product companies.
The
Post
is concerned that
the Questions the Committee must address don’t include
specific
mention of red and processed meat, ultra-processed foods and salt
intake. Since eight of the Questions begin with
“What is
the relationship between dietary patterns consumed and”,,, (a
wide range of health outcomes), I feel sure the recommendations will
include comments about meat, processing and salt, since they are
dietary pattern components.
The
Post
assertss that the
agencies permitting the committee to make decisions based only on
studies vetted by officials from the agencies, which are headed by
political appointees. The Guidelines website says that
“The
Committee is using three scientific approaches to examine the evidence:
data analysis, food pattern modeling, and systematic reviews. Each
approach has its own rigorous methodology. For each question, a
specific protocol is created to describe how the Committee will apply
the methodology for one of those approaches to answer the question.
Each protocol is created before the Advisory Committee examines any
evidence and is posted below for the public to view...”
That sounds reasonable. I know the Committee’s
Chair,
Barbara Schneeman PhD. Her scientific and ethical standards
have
always been above reproach and I’m confident that
she’ll
steer a sound course.
An additional concern is that none of the Questions address food
sustainability and meat production’s effect on the
environment. Animals are an important protein source in a
typical
human omnivorous diet, but meat production has a disproportionate
impact on the environment. It contributes 18% of global
greenhouse gases. The 2015 Guidelines addressed these issues
but
created considerable controversy. Political pressure from
Congress, the meat industry and special interest groups scuttled
mention of these issues in the final Guidelines. This year’s
Committee may be gun-shy.
The Committee wants our input, in person or via webcast. The
last
two committee meetings are January 23-24, 2020 in Houston
https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/meeting-4
and March 12-13, 2020 in Washington, DC (see future link at
https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/work-under-way/review-science/public-meetings
when posted.